Entitled to their frustration…

June 30th, 2005 Stewart

pure luck touches on a lot of the more maddening aspects of the transition from higher ed to career, and these frustrations are entirely valid.

At age 18, I was basically let go. Mom and Dad raised me to be an independent thinker, and to achieve on my own terms, in my own way. I worked several minimum wage gigs through college, and I had scholarship money to make up the difference. Financial aid was actually available in the 1980s, and I took what was there while the first Bush administration whittled federal monies away to nothing. In four years, I graduated with a BA and about $1000 in credit card debt. It was hard, and I lived hand-to-mouth much of the time, but I did it myself.

I went to library school and followed the same process, working two different jobs, taking night classes, and eventually being awarded a one-year fellowship in science reference — again, the federal gov’t doesn’t have any such fellowship monies anymore. Two years later, I’d gotten my MLIS, and had about $2000 total in credit card debt. Jobs were available when I graduated — I took my first gig as a librarian for $21,000 a year, paid down the credit cards, and was on my way to slowly working up the professional ladder. In all seven years of my post-HS education, I can count the number of times I called Mom and asked for money on one hand.

Is our federal government doing even one-tenth what it should to support financial aid for undergrads? Not even. Did the Mils get screwed into thinking that $40K of student loans and a BA entitled them to a good, high-paying job? Yes, I really think a number of them did.

I think their parents didn’t do them any favors — Many of these kids have recieved more praise for minor achievements than is really good for them, and the “helicopter” attitude of parents on into the college years means many of the Mils have yet to truly have to live on their own. I think the quality of higher education has dropped significantly over the last decade. I think we’re shipping too many good jobs overseas. I think the Millennial population is too big, too competitive, and is going to find a very hostile, demanding, and unrewarding work environment. Those Mils who adopt an attitude of entitlement, where they either have their demands met or they leave, will find dozens of other Mils ready to take their jobs from them.

I do not for a moment question the smarts, the work ethic, or the abilities of these kids. But I do think that the world is a very harsh place, and I think that many, though by no means all, Millennials will find that they are not entitled to much out here.

What comes after graduation is always harder than what came before, and the rewards take time and experience as well as a positive attitude. I think the Mils are going to do amazing things in their lifetimes, but they will have to learn to be patient. They are entitled to their frustration, but really nothing else.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

And the debate rolls on…

June 30th, 2005 Stewart

An open letter response to the AP Entitlement Generation article is generating a ton of comment all over the blogosphere. My favorite response thus far is this one but I’ve still got a lot of reading left to do. More later.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Young Labeled ‘Entitlement Generation’

June 28th, 2005 Stewart

Early Millennials who are now entering the workforce are getting a new label. (I should mention that I came up with the same label a couple of weeks ago — not that it’s original or anything.) One quote in particular that I like:

“It’s true they’re not eager to bury themselves in a cubicle and take orders from bosses for the next 40 years, and why should they?” asks Jeffrey Arnett, a University of Maryland psychologist who’s written a book on “emerging adulthood,” the period between age 18 and 25. “They have a healthy skepticism of the commitment their employers have to them and the commitment they owe to their employers.”

Lately, I’ve been running into older librarians who believe that Gen Xers and Millennials will learn to have greater commitment to their employers as they grow older. Nothing in the literature would confirm this attitude; in fact, quite the opposite.

Xers, in particular, tend toward entrepreneurship, and Mils believe it is better to demonstrate their skills and flexibility by switching jobs frequently, rather than sticking with one job for many years. The overall perception from both groups is that longevity in any one workplace often leads to burnout, which Mils have seen in their own parents. Since Xers believe they won’t be allowed to retire, and Mils have no concept of retirement, the incentives for company loyalty are all short-term and superficial — salary instead of 401K, flexible scheduling instead of earned vacation, etc. — and they will leave any job for one that offers better salary and perks, regardless of potential for long-term growth and financial security.

As suggested by the article, many employers are going to have to find new ways of working with younger employees. In academic libraries, this shift may mean a second look at faculty status for librarians.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Reading, Writing, Retailing

June 28th, 2005 Stewart

To Eggers, Calegari and Moulthrop, a blessing on your respective houses — Every school board administrator, every superintendant, every state governor, and, most importantly, every tax-paying parent of a public school student, should pay heed to your words and make this the year we turn public education around in this country.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

24/7, Teens Get the Message

June 27th, 2005 Stewart

Yet another “Teens Like Technology” article, which is nothing new, but an interesting stat hidden away in the article mentions that the single-largest consumer group of computer chips is 15-year-old girls, attributed mostly to cell phones. In fact, the whole article focuses on the communications aspect of technology, and how the Millennials stay in constant contact with one another.

One interesting side note in the article is the use of instant messaging to create alternative personae online — the white-bread ballerina who becomes “darkgrrl24″ or whatever — to “try out” different lifestyles. They also use IM to meet, date, and break-up online, apparently to save themselves having “sad, miserable” conversations in the real world. This feels a little self-deceptive to me, like kids who aren’t ready to really explore alternative lifestyles or have “boyfriend/girlfriend” relationships using technology to keep themselves from feeling pain, disappointment, rejection — the negative emotions that can often be the strongest character-building and emotional “learning” moments that young people have.

But I also get the impression that this is no trend; really more of a minority of wired Mils using technology as a communications “shield.” As always, I’d like to hear more about the weirder, more awkward Mils who don’t always fit the SuperKids standard Howe & Strauss put out there. I would think that their world must seem strikingly different from their high-impact peers.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

More dads want to be Mr. Mom

June 21st, 2005 Stewart

Gen-X dads possess much different values than their Boomer predecessors. As a soon-to-be Dad myself, I can say this article reflects some of my own ideals — fewer office hours, greater flexibility by telecommuting, and if the wife ever snags the 6-figure dream job, I would happily stay at home and raise the kid, as one of my brothers did recently. (A man can dream, can’t he?)

That said, I’m concerned about the seemingly “push poll” nature of CareerBuilder.com’s survey, especially where they try to justify lower salaries for those who adopt flexible work schedules. Salaries shouldn’t be cut if work goals are being met, period. To suggest that only the hours matter when considering salaries for professional men (or women, for that matter) seems underhanded.

More to the point though, if a Gen-X dad (or mom) can get 40 hours worth of work done in 30 hours, with a combination of in-office and telecommuting activities, doesn’t he (or she) deserve to make a 40 hour salary?

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Input Substitution and Grade Inflation

June 20th, 2005 Stewart

More grist for the Mils, so to speak.

The comments are interesting as well, especially from the faculty member who will “happily inflate grades” for as long as she can. As long as inflating grades makes faculty members happy, why should ethics matter, right?

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

False Securities

June 17th, 2005 Stewart

I only just discovered this one, via the “A’s for Everyone” article below. The concept of “customer service” has, I’m sorry to say, completely bumfuzzled admins and professors alike in higher education. The student, or his/her parent, as the case may be, is paying for the opportunity to succeed or fail in learning. Learning nothing at $20K per semester is an expensive lesson, to be sure, but graduating everyone with A’s only gives them a piece of paper, an artificially inflated sense of self-worth, and a ticket to disaster in an unforgiving, demanding, and yes, shrinking workforce.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

U of C is Stacked!

June 9th, 2005 Stewart

Inside Higher Ed :: The Joy of Stacks

The value of a deep, rich, and abundant book collection cannot be overstated. Academic libraries that treat their books like an afterthought risk becoming an afterthought themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The "Entitlement" Generation

June 9th, 2005 Stewart

A’s for Everyone!

This Washington Post article makes a number of really good points, in particular about the way in which students approach faculty regarding their grades and how this is a reflection of high demands placed on these students in other arenas. The sense of student entitlement, though, that comes from “really trying hard” and that grades should reflect effort, not achievement, can’t be explained away as just another symptom of the high-pressure Millennial lifestyle. It reflects, instead, a deeply felt conviction that their parents have instilled in them since birth, that “giving it your best” is all that really matters.

But the students have learned a different lesson. They have been consistently rewarded for saying that they’ve given it their all, whether they have or not. They’ve had their grades bumped up for them routinely during their K-12 years, by complaining and saying they would try harder, and then they hit college and expect the same thing to work here. And since Outcome has always equalled the appearance of Effort and Concern, the Millennials seem to be convinced that they will find great rewards in their future endeavors, as long as they Try, whether or not they Succeed.

I’m not sure that they will find much reward for Effort without Success when they begin their careers. But then, I’ve just started to hear stories about helicopter parents who have continued to do their kids’ “homework” for them, on into the first years of work after college…

“Dad, how do I fill a prescription for simvastatin?”

Scary.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »