Weapons of Mass Instruction — The Millennial Generation

March 21st, 2005 Stewart Posted in Uncategorized |

Weapons of Mass Instruction has posted an interesting piece on the Millennial Generation, mostly crafted from reading through the free Educause e-book, Educating the Net Generation. The book, BTW, is a solid read and I’d recommend it to anyone interested in these issues.

I agree with much of what WMI says, especially his conclusions. In the years leading up to college, it seems that Mils have been taught “to the test,” especially as regards standardized tests (SAT, Regents/Governors Exams, etc.). Traditionally, higher ed has focused on lifelong learning, creativity, originality, and critical thinking. Now there seems to be a general belief that higher education should change its model to more of a business-minded, goals-oriented diploma engine. This is a philosophical difference that will have a dramatic impact in the next few years in higher ed, mark my words.

That said, as someone who is frequently called on to present about Mils and their learning behaviors, I should mention that there are significant (and documented) differences between Mils and other generations. For example, Gen Xers despise team-based assignments and tend not to learn as much from working with a group as they do working on their own. Mils, on the other hand, tend to learn best working with other Mils. Boomers and other returning learners often have a harder time integrating multimedia and higher end IT into their learning models than do Mils. These are just a couple of examples.

The myth of multitasking, though, I think WMI hit dead on. Attention span is finite — split it between five tasks instead of just one and you’ll see a drop in quality across the board. Otherwise, many of the hallmarks of “good education” for the Mils are, as he suggests, simply hallmarks of good education in general.

3 Responses to “Weapons of Mass Instruction — The Millennial Generation”

  1. I think we’re generally on the same page. I’m also concerned about some of the changes that are happening in higher ed. College should be about expanding your horizons; thinking the thoughts you never would have thought on your own. While we’re naive if we aren’t informed about who our students are or what they expect, I also believe that we’re likely to see a decrease in creativity and critial thought if we simply cater to those expectations the same way that Burger King does.

  2. It’s a balancing act, to be sure. Knowing your students can inform instruction in much the same way that knowing your audience will inform writing or public speaking. That said, higher education is supposed to be about increasing the individual’s capacity for real, independent scholarship and critical thinking. If we embrace too fully the Millennial state of being, we definitely risk losing our focus in academia. Thanks for commenting.
    (BTW, I never was able to get my comments to post on your blog. I’m running Firefox 1.0.1 but cookies are turned off. Is that the problem? Just FYI…)

  3. Nevermind — I just realized that you must be moderating the comments section. Duh. :-)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.